Free Oracle Magazine Profit:The Executive's Guide to Oracle Applications

Enter your e-mail address to receive notifications when there are new posts

Profit Magazine: The Executive's Guide to Oracle Applications

R12 SLA vis-à-vis AX of 11i

Posted on December 8th, 2007 by Sanjit Anand |Print This Post Print This Post |Email This Post Email This Post

Read this:

We have already seen oracle new Oracle Sub ledger Accounting replaces the Global Accounting Engine, which normally used for European & Regional Localizations need in earlier versions. SLA itself extends the AX engine functionality by providing customizable accounting rules via a flexible

Is SLA a clone of AX?
Yes, almost the functionality was derived from there itself, lets see vis-à-vis to uptake some of the functionality in these two products.

AX SLA VISAVIS1

Not only functionality, some of the reports replaces the corresponding reports of the Global Accounting Engine.

AX SLA VISAVIS2

The good is that both the Global Accounting Engine(AX) and Oracle Subledger Accounting(SLA) generate accounting from a compiled definition of accounting rules defined by users. Oracle Subledger Accounting further maintains version control on the rules enabling users to modify the rules while maintaining auditability.

What you say..sounds good :)

Posted in EBS Suite, Functional, R12, Release12, Subledger Accounting | Email This Post Email This Post | Print This Post Print This Post

One Response
  1. Vinay Says:

    Ofcourse the base for SLA is AX, but SLA is much more advanced and have better performing architecture compare to AX. You can also see SLA is opening for Third party application integration.

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.